lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQW6BDpSjNjbinHEkpud2QqQOqskkXca6z+Fq0fo+=pKyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:32:22 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Make container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Make the ACPI container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler for
> representing the object used to initialize ACPI containers and remove
> the ACPI driver structure used previously and the data structures
> created by it, since in fact they were not used for any purpose.
>
> This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint by
> avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver object with the
> driver core and creation of its sysfs directory which is unnecessary.
>
> In addition to that, make the namespace walk callback used for
> installing the notify handlers for ACPI containers more
> straightforward.
>
> This change includes fixes from Toshi Kani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Yes, container support should be built-in by nature.

Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>

What is the next?

dock?

Hope someone with access of dock that have pcie devices could help
sorting it out...

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ