[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBD4ZJN7uXQ5xY1GF14j_DydDQEpuZNct-UiNXTBARpQSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:39:56 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] stop_machine: check work->done while handling enqueued works
The comment just above cpu_stop_signal_done() says it is uncertain that
the input @done is valid, and the works enqueued through the function
stop_one_cpu_nowait() do carry no done, thus we have to check if it is
valid when updating work result.
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
---
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c Thu Feb 7 20:03:10 2013
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c Fri Feb 8 11:07:40 2013
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ repeat:
preempt_disable();
ret = fn(arg);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret && done != NULL)
done->ret = ret;
/* restore preemption and check it's still balanced */
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists