[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51147CCF.7050100@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:49:27 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: "Kumar, Anil" <anilkumar.v@...com>
CC: "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"wim@...ana.be" <wim@...ana.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: davinci_wdt: update to devm_* API
On 2/8/2013 8:05 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 23:20:48, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>> On 2/7/2013 9:02 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>>> Update the code to use devm_* API so that driver
>>> core will manage resources.
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar, Anil <anilkumar.v@...com>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c
>>> @@ -201,10 +200,10 @@ static struct miscdevice davinci_wdt_miscdev = {
>>>
>>> static int davinci_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> - int ret = 0, size;
>>> - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>
>> Its not clear why you had to drop use of this variable?
>
> Actually, I have not found any particular need to take pointer
> into dev and then use in the code. Rather we can directly use.
No, it is good enough as-is. It will help rid your patch of unnecessary
changes and its not really convenient to to keep reading &pdev->dev all
the time.
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists