linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpokNg5KdTjR3JqMVZSw0=Rkqk+YMf5XpAimaXBRFsbFtiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:02:01 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	valdis.kletnieks@...edu, artem.savkov@...il.com,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
	Liviu.Dudau@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9

On 8 February 2013 05:03, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> I should have done that before, sorry about it.

np

> Can you please rework this series on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq and
> try to avoid introducing new issues this time?

Sorry for this. I didn't got any such issues on my system and i tried to think
as widely as possible. But still just a human with some mistakes :)

> If this works, we'll rebase all of the other new material on top of it,
> if possible.

To make your life a bit easy, i have got all cpufreq patches, that you & me
have got for 3.9, rebased over pm-cpufreq and these are:

f3843e0 cpufreq: exynos: simplify .init() for setting policy->cpus
7ea6658 cpufreq: kirkwood: Add a cpufreq driver for Marvell Kirkwood SoCs
6002fd0 cpufreq/x86: Add P-state driver for sandy bridge.
bcfe254 cpufreq_stats: do not remove sysfs files if frequency table is
not present
6c82b96 cpufreq: Do not track governor name for scaling drivers with
internal governors.
2a6df07 cpufreq: Only call cpufreq_out_of_sync() for driver that
implement cpufreq_driver.target()
0893112 cpufreq: Retrieve current frequency from scaling drivers with
internal governors
e034e73 cpufreq: Fix locking issues
003da79 cpufreq: Create a macro for unlock_policy_rwsem{read,write}
0092c75 cpufreq: Remove unused HOTPLUG_CPU code
34d5833 cpufreq: governors: Fix WARN_ON() for multi-policy platforms
e1ee7c8 cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to use RCU
e076b60 cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to a rwlock
6d919f9 cpufreq: ondemand: Replace down_differential tuner with adj_up_threshold
80dd878 cpufreq / stats: Get rid of CPUFREQ_STATDEVICE_ATTR
a7e183d cpufreq: Don't check cpu_online(policy->cpu)
9db0116 cpufreq: add imx6q-cpufreq driver

I have pushed them in for-rafael branch in my repo. Look carefully at
the first two patches,
they were not present in your latest repo.

This was the exynos patch i was talking about:

f3843e0 cpufreq: exynos: simplify .init() for setting policy->cpus

I don't know if you dropped this one or what ?

7ea6658 cpufreq: kirkwood: Add a cpufreq driver for Marvell Kirkwood SoCs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/