[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360318129.7515.278.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:08:49 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] selftests: Add tests for efivarfs
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 18:05 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> However, the tests expose a bug at the moment, so run_tests will fail.
> Matt will have that fixed soon though :)
In which case, would it make more sense for me to take these tests
through the efi tree? I'm fine either way, I'm just looking for the
least surprising option.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists