[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh2x=nn24DC-jpD_UsZ2z6=5d9GmZqwowKF8X0zQQX=vZmbqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:26:16 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at
kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> Nah, I pulled in latest pm-next where this commit is new...
>
> commit 8d5666f3456f2fd4a4e5dced228475b829851e53
> "ACPI: Unbind ACPI drv when probe failed"
>
> ...building with it.
>
> Same to you, say concretely which commit is fixing what...
>
> Pull-N-B-Happy was never my strategy... I want to understand what went
> wrong and have stolen my time.
I don't have any pointers to broken tree and so can't point you to the culprit,
but it was this patch:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=commit;h=e034e731f4d9d18ad0401f033f485a3096796c58
minus
the patch i sent you as attachment.
There were some locking introduced around init/exit of cpufreq_driver, which
caused some drivers to break. Its fixed now in the above commit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists