linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:25:03 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at
 kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]

On 8 February 2013 22:21, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>> No, it did NOT apply cleanly and I merged your tree like this.

Patch looks fine to me.

>> To me it does not look like your changes from the patch you sent me
>> are included?

Yes they do. Check most of the changes from cpufreq.c which remove
locks around init/exit.

> Looks like I did it correct - no WARNINGs.
>
> So, suspend-resume is good here.

Great!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/