[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511534C2.3020103@semaphore.gr>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:24:18 +0200
From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Fix typos in comments
Fix some typos in comments.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 09b27ae..f3eb26c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
#include "cpufreq_governor.h"
-/* On-demand governor macors */
+/* On-demand governor macros */
#define DEF_FREQUENCY_DOWN_DIFFERENTIAL (10)
#define DEF_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (80)
#define DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR (1)
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static void ondemand_powersave_bias_init_cpu(int cpu)
* efficient idling at a higher frequency/voltage is.
* Pavel Machek says this is not so for various generations of AMD and old
* Intel systems.
- * Mike Chan (androidlcom) calis this is also not true for ARM.
+ * Mike Chan (android.com) claims this is also not true for ARM.
* Because of this, whitelist specific known (series) of CPUs by default, and
* leave all others up to the user.
*/
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static int should_io_be_busy(void)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
/*
- * For Intel, Core 2 (model 15) andl later have an efficient idle.
+ * For Intel, Core 2 (model 15) and later have an efficient idle.
*/
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6 &&
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ static void dbs_freq_increase(struct cpufreq_policy *p, unsigned int freq)
/*
* Every sampling_rate, we check, if current idle time is less than 20%
- * (default), then we try to increase frequency Every sampling_rate, we look for
- * a the lowest frequency which can sustain the load while keeping idle time
+ * (default), then we try to increase frequency. Every sampling_rate, we look
+ * for the lowest frequency which can sustain the load while keeping idle time
* over 30%. If such a frequency exist, we try to decrease to this frequency.
*
* Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_min(struct kobject *kobj,
* update_sampling_rate - update sampling rate effective immediately if needed.
* @new_rate: new sampling rate
*
- * If new rate is smaller than the old, simply updaing
+ * If new rate is smaller than the old, simply updating
* dbs_tuners_int.sampling_rate might not be appropriate. For example, if the
* original sampling_rate was 1 second and the requested new sampling rate is 10
* ms because the user needs immediate reaction from ondemand governor, but not
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists