linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/32] Generic dynamic per cpu refcounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:50:41 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, zab@...hat.com, bcrl@...ck.org,
	jmoyer@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/32] Generic dynamic per cpu refcounting

On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:49:02 +0100 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:

> > > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
> > 
> > What's the status of this series?  The percpu-refcnt part is still
> > going through review and the merge window is opening up pretty soon.
> > Kent, Andrew?
> 
> I'd feel a lot better deferring the whole aio/dio performance series for
> one merge window. There's very little point in rushing it, and I don't
> think it's been reviewed/tested enough yet.

OK by me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/