[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1360353716-51368-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:01:56 -0700
From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] perf/x86: x86_schedule_events(): avoid 512 byte stack variable
x86_schedule_events() creates a 512 byte automatic variable
when compiled for 64 bit. Dynamically allocate this array
to avoid possible stack corruption. Smatch analysis:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c:727 x86_schedule_events() warn:
'constraints' puts 512 bytes on stack
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 2.6.34.y and higher
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
---
This large stack variable was introduced with 63b146490befc027a7e0923e333269e68b20d380
in 2.6.34. Since it has been around for awhile I don't know if its really a
problem on this code path, but it does consume a good size chunk of the kernel stack.
Applies cleanly to 3.3.y and higher. Needs backport for older kernels.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index bf0f01a..1f2005e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -718,11 +718,15 @@ int perf_assign_events(struct event_constraint **constraints, int n,
int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int *assign)
{
- struct event_constraint *c, *constraints[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
+ struct event_constraint *c, **constraints;
unsigned long used_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(X86_PMC_IDX_MAX)];
int i, wmin, wmax, num = 0;
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
+ constraints = kmalloc(X86_PMC_IDX_MAX*sizeof(*constraints), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!constraints)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
bitmap_zero(used_mask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
for (i = 0, wmin = X86_PMC_IDX_MAX, wmax = 0; i < n; i++) {
@@ -770,6 +774,9 @@ int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int *assign)
x86_pmu.put_event_constraints(cpuc, cpuc->event_list[i]);
}
}
+
+ kfree(constraints);
+
return num ? -EINVAL : 0;
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists