[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130208222107.GA4762@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:21:07 +0000
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
To: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@...bpm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...bao.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] eventfd: implementation of EFD_MASK flag
Martin Sustrik <sustrik@...bpm.com> wrote:
> On 07/02/13 23:44, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >That's a nice changelog but it omitted a critical thing: why do you
> >think the kernel needs this feature? What's the value and use case for
> >being able to poll these descriptors?
>
> To address the question, I've written down detailed description of
> the challenges of the network protocol development in user space and
> how the proposed feature addresses the problems.
>
> It's too long to fit into ChangeLog, but it may be worth reading
> when trying to judge the merit of the patch.
>
> It can be found here: http://www.250bpm.com/blog:16
Using one eventfd per userspace socket still seems a bit wasteful.
Couldn't you use a single pipe for all sockets and write the efd_mask to
the pipe for each socket?
A read from the pipe would behave like epoll_wait.
You might need to use one-shot semantics; but that's probably
the easiest thing in multithreaded apps anyways.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists