[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2792362.JXCag4GJsR@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 00:56:31 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: valdis.kletnieks@...edu, artem.savkov@...il.com,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9
On Friday, February 08, 2013 09:02:37 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq.
> >
> > I already did. Please check for-rafael branch
>
> Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then?
OK, applied to bleeding-edge. Hopefully it will be build-tested over the
weekend and I can move it to linux-next.
I dropped the rwlock/RCU patches from Nathan, though, because I had some
doubts about the correctness of the RCU one and the rwlock one alone would
conflict with your further changes.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists