linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add keyword "tegra" to Tegra section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51159C96.5080505@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:47:18 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	arm@...nel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add keyword "tegra" to Tegra section

On 02/08/2013 05:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 13:04 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> (?<!in)tegra
> 
> This doesn't work well.   It matches too many
> words like integral.

Hmmm. That's exactly what the (?<!in) negative look-behind assertion is
attempting to avoid. It works fine here. Is there some dependency on
Perl version or something? My Perl version is v5.14.2.

> I suggest
> 
> K:	(?:\btegra\b|\bTEGRA_)
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/