[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5117F53A.20307@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:00:02 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@...k.pl, sbw@....edu,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/45] percpu_rwlock: Make percpu-rwlocks IRQ-safe,
optimally
On 02/11/2013 12:12 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> only one cosmetic nit...
>
> On 01/22, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>
>> +#define READER_PRESENT (1UL << 16)
>> +#define READER_REFCNT_MASK (READER_PRESENT - 1)
>> +
>> #define reader_uses_percpu_refcnt(pcpu_rwlock, cpu) \
>> (ACCESS_ONCE(per_cpu(*((pcpu_rwlock)->reader_refcnt), cpu)))
>>
>> #define reader_nested_percpu(pcpu_rwlock) \
>> - (__this_cpu_read(*((pcpu_rwlock)->reader_refcnt)) > 1)
>> + (__this_cpu_read(*((pcpu_rwlock)->reader_refcnt)) & READER_REFCNT_MASK)
>>
>> #define writer_active(pcpu_rwlock) \
>> (__this_cpu_read(*((pcpu_rwlock)->writer_signal)))
>
> I think this all can go to lib/percpu-rwlock.c. Nobody needs to know
> these implementation details.
>
Ok, will move them.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists