[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5117F638.9070700@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:04:16 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
rostedt@...dmis.org, rjw@...k.pl, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu, tj@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/45] CPU hotplug: Provide APIs to prevent CPU offline
from atomic context
Hi Namhyung,
On 01/29/2013 03:51 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Srivatsa,
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:04:54 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> @@ -246,15 +291,21 @@ struct take_cpu_down_param {
>> static int __ref take_cpu_down(void *_param)
>> {
>> struct take_cpu_down_param *param = _param;
>> - int err;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + int err = 0;
>
> It seems no need to set 'err' to 0.
>
Sorry for the late reply. This mail got buried in my inbox and
I hadn't noticed it until now.. :-(
I'll remove the unnecessary initialization. Thank you!
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists