linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] uprobes/tracing: Kill uprobe_trace_consumer, embed uprobe_consumer into trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130211091856.GA525@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:48:56 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
	Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] uprobes/tracing: Kill uprobe_trace_consumer, embed
 uprobe_consumer into trace_uprobe

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> [2013-02-04 18:20:10]:
> 
> But so far I think that a chain of multiple consumers makes no sense.
> Each consumer->handler() will use the same call->perf_events list, this
> will only complicate the code for no reason.
> 
> > However with allowing prefiltering, we need to have ability to
> > distinguish consumers.
> 
> Certainly not. Please see the patches I am going to send.
> 

Yeah, Looking at the next patchset made me realize this. 

thanks

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/