lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130211094353.GD525@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:13:53 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_apply()

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> [2013-02-04 20:02:50]:

> Currently it is not possible to change the filtering constraints after
> uprobe_register(), so a consumer can not, say, start to trace a task/mm
> which was previously filtered out, or remove the no longer needed bp's.
> 
> Introduce uprobe_apply() which simply does register_for_each_vma() again
> to consult uprobe_consumer->filter() and install/remove the breakpoints.
> The only complication is that register_for_each_vma() can no longer
> assume that uprobe->consumers should be consulter if is_register == T,
> so we change it to accept "struct uprobe_consumer *new" instead.
> 
> Unlike uprobe_register(), uprobe_apply(true) doesn't do "unregister" if
> register_for_each_vma() fails, it is up to caller to handle the error.
> 
> Note: we probably need to cleanup the current interface, it is strange
> that uprobe_apply/unregister need inode/offset. We should either change
> uprobe_register() to return "struct uprobe *", or add a private ->uprobe
> member in uprobe_consumer. And in the long term uprobe_apply() should
> take a single argument, uprobe or consumer, even "bool add" should go
> away.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>


Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/uprobes.h |    6 ++++++
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> index 95d0002..02b83db 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ extern int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsign
>  extern int __weak set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
>  extern bool __weak is_swbp_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
>  extern int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
> +extern int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool);
>  extern void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
>  extern int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>  extern void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> @@ -124,6 +125,11 @@ uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
>  {
>  	return -ENOSYS;
>  }
> +static inline int
> +uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool add)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
>  static inline void
>  uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
>  {
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 23340a7..2bcd08e 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -733,8 +733,10 @@ build_map_info(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t offset, bool is_register)
>  	return curr;
>  }
> 
> -static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
> +static int
> +register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *new)
>  {
> +	bool is_register = !!new;
>  	struct map_info *info;
>  	int err = 0;
> 
> @@ -765,7 +767,7 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
> 
>  		if (is_register) {
>  			/* consult only the "caller", new consumer. */
> -			if (consumer_filter(uprobe->consumers,
> +			if (consumer_filter(new,
>  					UPROBE_FILTER_REGISTER, mm))
>  				err = install_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, vma, info->vaddr);
>  		} else if (test_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags)) {
> @@ -788,7 +790,7 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
>  static int __uprobe_register(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
>  {
>  	consumer_add(uprobe, uc);
> -	return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, true);
> +	return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, uc);
>  }
> 
>  static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
> @@ -798,7 +800,7 @@ static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *u
>  	if (!consumer_del(uprobe, uc))	/* WARN? */
>  		return;
> 
> -	err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, false);
> +	err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, NULL);
>  	/* TODO : cant unregister? schedule a worker thread */
>  	if (!uprobe->consumers && !err)
>  		delete_uprobe(uprobe);
> @@ -855,6 +857,35 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_register);
> 
>  /*
> + * uprobe_apply - unregister a already registered probe.
> + * @inode: the file in which the probe has to be removed.
> + * @offset: offset from the start of the file.
> + * @uc: consumer which wants to add more or remove some breakpoints
> + * @add: add or remove the breakpoints
> + */
> +int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> +			struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool add)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe *uprobe;
> +	struct uprobe_consumer *con;
> +	int ret = -ENOENT;
> +
> +	uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
> +	if (!uprobe)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	down_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> +	for (con = uprobe->consumers; con && con != uc ; con = con->next)
> +		;
> +	if (con)
> +		ret = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, add ? uc : NULL);
> +	up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> +	put_uprobe(uprobe);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * uprobe_unregister - unregister a already registered probe.
>   * @inode: the file in which the probe has to be removed.
>   * @offset: offset from the start of the file.
> -- 
> 1.5.5.1
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ