lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5118C522.3070905@parallels.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:17:06 +0400
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
CC:	<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Leonid Moiseichuk <leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	<patches@...aro.org>, <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: Add memory.pressure_level events

Hi Anton,

> diff --git a/mm/vmpressure.c b/mm/vmpressure.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7922503


> +struct vmpressure_event {
> +	struct eventfd_ctx *efd;
> +	enum vmpressure_levels level;
> +	struct list_head node;
> +};
> +
> +static bool vmpressure_event(struct vmpressure *vmpr,
> +			     unsigned long s, unsigned long r)
> +{
> +	struct vmpressure_event *ev;
> +	int level = vmpressure_calc_level(vmpressure_win, s, r);
> +	bool signalled = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vmpr->events_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(ev, &vmpr->events, node) {
> +		if (level >= ev->level) {
> +			eventfd_signal(ev->efd, 1);
> +			signalled++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&vmpr->events_lock);
> +
> +	return signalled;
> +}
> +
> +static struct vmpressure *vmpressure_parent(struct vmpressure *vmpr)
> +{
> +	struct cgroup *cg = vmpr_to_css(vmpr)->cgroup->parent;
> +
> +	if (!cg)
> +		return NULL;
> +	return cg_to_vmpr(cg);
> +}

Unfortunately, "parent" in memcg have different meanings for information
propagation purposes depending on the value of the flag "use_hierarchy".
That is set for deprecation, but still...

I suggest you use the helper mem_cgroup_parent, that will already give
you the right parent (either immediate parent or root) with all that
taken into account.

> +
> +static int vmpressure_register_level(struct cgroup *cg, struct cftype *cft,
> +				     struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd,
> +				     const char *args)
> +{
> +	struct vmpressure *vmpr = cg_to_vmpr(cg);
> +	struct vmpressure_event *ev;
> +	int lvl;
> +
> +	for (lvl = 0; lvl < VMPRESSURE_NUM_LEVELS; lvl++) {
> +		if (!strcmp(vmpressure_str_levels[lvl], args))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (lvl >= VMPRESSURE_NUM_LEVELS)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ev->efd = eventfd;
> +	ev->level = lvl;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vmpr->events_lock);
> +	list_add(&ev->node, &vmpr->events);
> +	mutex_unlock(&vmpr->events_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vmpressure_unregister_level(struct cgroup *cg, struct cftype *cft,
> +					struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd)
> +{
> +	struct vmpressure *vmpr = cg_to_vmpr(cg);
> +	struct vmpressure_event *ev;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vmpr->events_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(ev, &vmpr->events, node) {
> +		if (ev->efd != eventfd)
> +			continue;
> +		list_del(&ev->node);
> +		kfree(ev);
> +		break;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&vmpr->events_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static struct cftype vmpressure_cgroup_files[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name = "pressure_level",
> +		.read = vmpressure_read_level,
> +		.register_event = vmpressure_register_level,
> +		.unregister_event = vmpressure_unregister_level,
> +	},
> +	{},
> +};
> +

> +
> +void __init enable_pressure_cgroup(void)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON(cgroup_add_cftypes(&mem_cgroup_subsys,
> +				   vmpressure_cgroup_files));
> +}

There is no functionality discovery going on here, and this is
conditional on nothing. Isn't it better then to just add the register +
read functions to memcontrol.c and add the files in the memcontrol cftype ?

> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 88c5fed..34f09b9 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1982,6 +1982,10 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
>  			}
>  			memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, &reclaim);
>  		} while (memcg);
> +
> +		vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
> +			   sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed);
> +
>  	} while (should_continue_reclaim(zone, sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed,
>  					 sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc));
>  }
> @@ -2167,6 +2171,8 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
>  		count_vm_event(ALLOCSTALL);
>  
>  	do {
> +		vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
> +				sc->priority);
>  		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
>  		aborted_reclaim = shrink_zones(zonelist, sc);
>  
vmscan part seems okay to me.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ