[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130211114040.GA2726@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:40:40 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc: "tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"b-cousson@...com" <b-cousson@...com>,
"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"stern@...land.harvard.edu" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] usb: phy: nop: Add device tree support and
binding information
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 04:02:41PM +0000, Roger Quadros wrote:
> The PHY clock, clock rate, VCC regulator and RESET regulator
> can now be provided via device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt | 34 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/usb/otg/nop-usb-xceiv.c | 36 +++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d7e2726
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +USB NOP PHY
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be usb-nop-xceiv
This might be better as "linux,usb-no-xceiv", given this is a Linux-specific
'device'.
Saying that, I'm not sure I understand why this device needs to be instantiated
from devicetree. As I understand it from looking at the driver, it's purely a
Linux implementation detail used in the case of autonomous PHYs, and not an
actual piece of hardware or firmware system. I must admit to being unfamiliar
with this area of hardware, have I misunderstood somethign here?
Can we not have drivers for autonomous PHYs initialise/register nop-usb-xceiv?
That way we don't leak Linux implementation details to the outside world, and
the dt can describe purely what's actually present in the system.
[...]
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists