lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130211035014.GA3303@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:20:14 +0530
From:	Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@...com>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Vijay Kumar Mishra <vijay.kumar@...com>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] SPEAr13xx_defconfig: Enable Memory split 2G/2G
 needed

Hi Nicolas,

On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:49:22PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > 
> > By mistake you have added an ST internal list in cc, fixed it now.
> > 
> > Subject should be:
> > 
> > ARM: SPEAr13xx: Enable 2G/2G Memory split in defconfig
> > 
> > On 8 February 2013 16:16, Vijay Kumar Mishra <vijay.kumar@...com> wrote:
> > > Memory split 2G/2G is enabled as needed for SPEAr1310 RevC board to boot.
> > > Before enabling this option the boot was hanging at uncompressing linux.
> 
> I disagree.  The subject could have been "put our head in the sand and 
> paper over bugs".
> 
> Please don't do that.  There is no reason for any machine not to boot 
> way past "Uncompressing Linux" with the default split.  The likely 
> reason it works with the 2G:2G split is because in that case the virtual 
> and physical RAM addresses in the kernel are the same, and therefore 
> missing p2v or v2p conversions are invisible.

I agree. Actually the details are misleading. SPEAr13xx chose this
option just for its own preference over high memory support.

@Vijay,
I think you should drop this patch and just enable high memory support
rather, if SPEAr13xx doesn't have any problem with that.

--
regards
Shiraz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ