linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:46:01 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, Steve.Bannister@....com, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors

On 11 February 2013 02:44, Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com> wrote:
> dbs_data->tuners is never freed, which means there is a memory leak
> across CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT and CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT events.
>
> The same goes for the ondemand governor.

Thanks for pointing out. Would be fixed in next version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/