[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130211155854.GV20996@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:58:54 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [char-misc-next 01/11 V2] mei: bus: Initial MEI bus type
implementation
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:30:51AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:46:12PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > > You already have a 'struct mei_device', which refers to the PCI device
> > > that owns the bus, and has clients attached to it. While it may be
> > > a little confusing to people that already worked with the current
> > > mei code, I think it would help to rename the existing 'mei_device'
> > > to 'mei_host' or something else that feels appropriate, and introduce
> > > the new structure as 'mei_device' derived from 'struct device', again
> > > matching what most other subsystems do.
> > I understand, and I agree it would make sense. As we're aiming at having this
> > patchset merged during the next merge window, would it be ok to have this
> > renaming phase as a follow up patch ?
>
> Do you mean for 3.9?
That's what I meant, yes.
> Sorry, my trees are now closed for new stuff like this for 3.9,
Out of curiosity, when do you close your trees for new stuff ? Is there a
fixed timeframe ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists