[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51192B95.1000103@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:34:13 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: kvmtool tree (Was: Re: [patch] config: fix make kvmconfig)
On 02/11/2013 08:34 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:18 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> That's complete nonsense. If you want to use pieces of the kernel
>> infrastructure, then just *take* them. There are loads of projects which
>> use the kernel config tools, for example. There's no need to be *in* the
>> kernel repo.
>
> Exactly. I do *not* want a abstraction layer just because somebody
> wants to use it. It causes idiotic guards in the header files etc. We
> already had that pain with the user-level header inclusions etc.
>
> Just copy it.
>
The UAPI work and "make headers_install" already has cleaned things up
immensely.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists