[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DC88CAD03C0052499C1907B327FC63229B95A0@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:26:20 +0000
From: "J, KEERTHY" <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Regulator: Reorder the min max assignment in the
sequence of regulator_set_voltage function
Hi Mark,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:59 PM
> To: J, KEERTHY
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; lgirdwood@...il.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Regulator: Reorder the min max assignment in the
> sequence of regulator_set_voltage function
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0530, J Keerthy wrote:
>
> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> > @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ struct regulator {
> > int uA_load;
> > int min_uV;
> > int max_uV;
> > + int curr_min_uV;
> > + int curr_max_uV;
>
> This change makes sense but I don't see why we need to add these to
> struct regulator - why not just store the values locally for unwinding?
Ok. I will send an updated patch. Thanks for the response
And sorry for the top posting.
Regards,
Keerthy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists