[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130211181627.GA21390@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:16:27 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] zram: gather statistics in a unique file
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:07:45AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 21:41 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
> > > in a single, reader-friendly, 'statistics' file. This not only reduces
> > > code but is also makes it easier to visualize. The new file looks like:
> > >
> > > Number of reads: 24
> > > Number of writes: 1055
> > > Invalid IO: 0
> > > Notify free: 0
> > > Zero pages: 1042
> > > Orig data size: 49152 bytes
> > > Compressed data: 838 bytes
> > > Total memory used: 53248 bytes
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
> >
> > No, please, the rule for sysfs is "one value per file", not files with
> > lots of data that you need to parse.
>
> Ok.
>
> >
> > If you want to do something like this, then do it in debugfs, but NEVER
> > in sysfs.
>
> So, you would you be open to having the statistics file in debugfs and
> removing the individual files sysfs?
If these are merely debugging information, they should go to debugfs.
If they are something that all users need/want, they should stay in
sysfs as-is.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists