[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1953281.cgEiiBGo0f@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:36:17 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Cc: "viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 linux-next 2/2] cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to use the rcu
On Monday, February 11, 2013 05:13:30 PM Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> There are some spots that I need to give a much deeper review, cpufreq_register_driver for example.
>
> But I believe
> > @@ -196,7 +195,7 @@ static void __cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *data, bool sysfs)
> > {
> > if (!sysfs)
> > kobject_put(&data->kobj);
> > - module_put(cpufreq_driver->owner);
> > + module_put(rcu_dereference(cpufreq_driver)->owner);
> > }
> would be ok. In the documentation whatisRCU.txt they give a very similar example.
Well, the very same document states the following:
Note that the value returned by rcu_dereference() is valid
only within the enclosing RCU read-side critical section.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists