[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51195301.8000606@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:22:25 -0600
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] mfd: twl-core: Collect global variables behind
one private structure (global)
On 02/08/2013 11:50 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 07:56 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> /**
>>> * twl_i2c_write - Writes a n bit register in TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL60X0
>>> * @mod_no: module number
>>> @@ -322,16 +323,17 @@ int twl_i2c_write(u8 mod_no, u8 *value, u8 reg, unsigned num_bytes)
>>> pr_err("%s: invalid module number %d\n", DRIVER_NAME, mod_no);
>>> return -EPERM;
>>> }
>>> - if (unlikely(!inuse)) {
>>> + if (unlikely(!twl_priv->ready)) {
>>
>> This is causing the kernel to panic on all my omap2 boards when booting linux-next
>> because twl_priv is not initialised yet.
>
> Good catch.
> I just wonder from where the twl_* call is coming on OMAP2. AFAIK the twl code
> is for OMAP3/4, for OMAP2 Menelaus is the one which is used.
> I'm currently working on to remove all those twl_* calls from random places in
> the kernel so we will only access twl via the MFD stack.
Good point. I just noticed that none of my omap2+ board were booting and
on omap3/4 I was the panic in the twl code. I can't say that I checked
the panic on omap2, so may be that was another problem?
I will update the changelog and re-send the patch.
Cheers
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists