[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130211223907.271653E3530@localhost>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:39:07 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: fix recursive locking in of_get_next_available_child()
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:15:32 -0700, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>
> of_get_next_available_child() acquires devtree_lock, then calls
> of_device_is_available() which calls of_get_property() which calls
> of_find_property() which tries to re-acquire devtree_lock, thus causing
> deadlock.
>
> To avoid this, create a new __of_device_is_available() which calls
> __of_get_property() instead, which calls __of_find_property(), which
> does not take the lock,. Update of_get_next_available_child() to call
> the new __of_device_is_available() since it already owns the lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Thanks for looking at this Stephen. I ended up applying my version of
this patch though just because it was more convenient to do so. It was
pretty much identical anyway.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists