linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] get_maintainer: allow keywords to match filenames

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1360627226.4707.6.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:00:26 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	arm@...nel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Julian Andres Klode <jak@...-linux.org>,
	Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] get_maintainer: allow keywords to match filenames

On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:40 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> 
> Allow K: entries in MAINTAINERS to match directly against filenames;
> either those extracted from patch +++ or --- lines, or those specified
> on the command-line using the -f option.
[]
> I don't think setting exact_pattern_match_hash would be appropriate here;
> at least for intended Tegra use case, this feature is to ensure that all
> Tegra-related driver changes get Cc'd to the Tegra mailing list. Setting
> exact_pattern_match_hash would prevent git history parsing for e.g. S-o-b
> tags, which still seems like it would be useful. Hence, this flag isn't
> set.

And I don't think that's necessary because for filenames,
you could add the appropriate control to the MAINTAINERS

"K:	^pattern$"

> The value in $hash{$tvi} doesn't seem relevant, so I just assign 0.

0 is good.

It would be relevant if --pattern-depth was set.

> Joe, I'm not sure if you care where this gets merged; could it go through
> arm-soc together with patch 2/2? A quick look at git history of the
> script in linux-next indicates there won't be conflicts doing that.

I don't care how it gets merged.

Andrew Morton typically picks these up but
if you want to get it merged separately,
I don't see a problem.

trivial comment below:

> diff --git a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
[]
> @@ -611,6 +611,10 @@ sub get_maintainers {
>  				    $hash{$tvi} = $value_pd;
>  				}
>  			    }
> +			} elsif ($type eq "K") {

This should probably be 'K' to match the other
'F' use above it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/