linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Allow clock alias provision from device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:47:40 +0200
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
CC:	<tony@...mide.com>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <balbi@...com>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Allow clock alias provision from device
 tree

On 02/11/2013 06:07 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:44:23PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Currently on OMAP, it is not possible to specify a clock consumer
>> to any of the OMAP generated clocks using the device tree. This can pose
>> a problem for external devices that run off an OMAP clock as we
>> can't reliably provide a reference to the clock in the device tree.
> 
> There is an established way of providing clocks in the devicetree using
> the clocks/clock-names properties. Wouldn't it be better using this
> for OMAP aswell?
> 
I agree with you, but I'm not sure when this migration will be done.
Rajendra/Santosh might know better.

regards,
-roger

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/