[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130212081028.GA19250@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:10:28 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get_user()
warnings
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 02/11/2013 07:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:37 PM, tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
> > <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> However, we can declare a bitfield using sizeof(), which is legal
> >> because sizeof() is a constant expression. This quiets the warning,
> >> although the code generated isn't 100% identical from the baseline
> >> before 96477b4 x86-32: Add support for 64bit get_user():
> >
> > Christ. This is so ugly that it's almost a work of art.
>
> :)
A real possibility would be that if this ever breaks in a GCC
version, or generates some really crappy code, we might get a
"you got what you asked for" shrug from GCC developers?
It's not like we could start a revolution over that.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists