[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360665592.4485.26.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:39:52 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, pjt@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v4 11/18] sched: log the cpu utilization at rq
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 11:06 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>
> The cpu's utilization is to measure how busy is the cpu.
> util = cpu_rq(cpu)->avg.runnable_avg_sum
> / cpu_rq(cpu)->avg.runnable_avg_period;
>
> Since the util is no more than 1, we use its percentage value in later
> caculations. And set the the FULL_UTIL as 100%.
>
> In later power aware scheduling, we are sensitive for how busy of the
> cpu, not how much weight of its load. As to power consuming, it is more
> related with cpu busy time, not the load weight.
I think we can make that argument in general; that is irrespective of
the actual policy. We simply never had anything better to go with.
So please clarify why you think this only applies to power aware
scheduling.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists