[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360680788.21867.9.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:53:08 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
efault@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: fix wrong rq's runnable_avg update with rt
task
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 14:23 +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> .set_curr_task = set_curr_task_idle,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index fc88644..9707092 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ extern const struct sched_class idle_sched_class;
>
> extern void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq, int cpu);
> extern void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq);
> +extern void idle_exit(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> @@ -884,6 +885,10 @@ static inline void idle_balance(int cpu, struct rq *rq)
> {
> }
>
> +static inline void idle_exit(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
> +{
> +}
> +
Is this part needed? I don't see it ever called when !CONFIG_SMP.
-- Steve
> #endif
>
> extern void sysrq_sched_debug_show(void);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists