[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpok8K_GTTO1mT_1yF39gHZKWKwuH=tHBd1-K8ewDpFFUew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:27:59 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] dma: coh901318_lli: avoid unbalanced locking
On 12 February 2013 16:28, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> I have not checked the code but there is a possibility that custom pool->lock
> is not needed at all due to dma_pool contains it's own lock.
Your viewpoint is fine, but we wanted the reason behind this patch
here. Please add appropriate stuff in only in logs.
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> ---
> drivers/dma/coh901318_lli.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/coh901318_lli.c b/drivers/dma/coh901318_lli.c
> index 3e96610..702112d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/coh901318_lli.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/coh901318_lli.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ coh901318_lli_alloc(struct coh901318_pool *pool, unsigned int len)
> dma_addr_t phy;
>
> if (len == 0)
> - goto err;
> + return NULL;
>
> spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists