| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130212155019.GO2666@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:50:19 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Richard Weinberger <rw@...utronix.de>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 32/40] rcu: Convert rcutree to hotplug state machine
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:01:01PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:11:38PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Do we really need so many states here ?
>
> Well, all that RCU does for CPU_DYING is to do tracing, which could be
> ditched. Required changes called out inline below.
>
> All that the CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_PREPARE notifiers do is set
> up affinity for the RCU-boost kthreads. These are unfortunately not
> per-CPU kthreads, but perhaps something similar could be set up. This is
> strictly a performance optimization, so the CPU_ONLINE notifier could
> be replaced by having the kthread check which of its CPUs was online.
> Unfortunately, the same is not true of CPU_DOWN_PREPARE because if the
> kthread was too slow about it, the scheduler would get annoyed about a
> kthread being runnable only on offlined CPUs.
>
> It is not clear that this is worthwhile. Thoughts on other ways to
> get this done?
Actually, would there be a problem with having a tag on these tasks
so that the scheduler avoids the splat? The idea would be to have the
scheduler break affinity if there are no longer any online CPUs in
the task's set, but just not splat. The task could then periodically
check to see if it is running on the wrong CPU, and if there is at
least one online CPU in its set, re-affinity itself.
Seems pretty simple, so I must be missing something. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > ---
> > include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 18 ++++++++
> > kernel/cpu.c | 12 +++++
> > kernel/rcutree.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ enum cpuhp_states {
> > CPUHP_PERF_PREPARE,
> > CPUHP_SCHED_MIGRATE_PREP,
> > CPUHP_WORKQUEUE_PREP,
> > + CPUHP_RCUTREE_PREPARE,
> > CPUHP_NOTIFY_PREPARE,
> > CPUHP_NOTIFY_DEAD,
> > CPUHP_CPUFREQ_DEAD,
> > @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ enum cpuhp_states {
> > CPUHP_AP_ARM64_TIMER_STARTING,
> > CPUHP_AP_KVM_STARTING,
> > CPUHP_AP_NOTIFY_DYING,
> > + CPUHP_AP_RCUTREE_DYING,
>
> Drop this.
>
> > CPUHP_AP_X86_TBOOT_DYING,
> > CPUHP_AP_S390_VTIME_DYING,
> > CPUHP_AP_SCHED_NOHZ_DYING,
> > @@ -39,6 +41,7 @@ enum cpuhp_states {
> > CPUHP_SCHED_MIGRATE_ONLINE,
> > CPUHP_WORKQUEUE_ONLINE,
> > CPUHP_CPUFREQ_ONLINE,
> > + CPUHP_RCUTREE_ONLINE,
> > CPUHP_NOTIFY_ONLINE,
> > CPUHP_NOTIFY_DOWN_PREPARE,
> > CPUHP_PERF_X86_UNCORE_ONLINE,
> > @@ -147,4 +150,19 @@ int workqueue_prepare_cpu(unsigned int c
> > int workqueue_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > int workqueue_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> >
> > +/* RCUtree hotplug events */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_TREE_RCU) || defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU)
> > +int rcutree_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > +int rcutree_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > +int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > +int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > +int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
>
> And this...
>
> > +#else
> > +#define rcutree_prepare_cpu NULL
> > +#define rcutree_online_cpu NULL
> > +#define rcutree_offline_cpu NULL
> > +#define rcutree_dead_cpu NULL
> > +#define rcutree_dying_cpu NULL
>
> And of course this.
>
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #endif
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/cpu.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/cpu.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/cpu.c
> > @@ -755,6 +755,10 @@ static struct cpuhp_step cpuhp_bp_states
> > .startup = workqueue_prepare_cpu,
> > .teardown = NULL,
> > },
> > + [CPUHP_RCUTREE_PREPARE] = {
> > + .startup = rcutree_prepare_cpu,
> > + .teardown = rcutree_dead_cpu,
> > + },
> > [CPUHP_NOTIFY_PREPARE] = {
> > .startup = notify_prepare,
> > .teardown = NULL,
> > @@ -787,6 +791,10 @@ static struct cpuhp_step cpuhp_bp_states
> > .startup = workqueue_online_cpu,
> > .teardown = workqueue_offline_cpu,
> > },
> > + [CPUHP_RCUTREE_ONLINE] = {
> > + .startup = rcutree_online_cpu,
> > + .teardown = rcutree_offline_cpu,
> > + },
> > [CPUHP_NOTIFY_ONLINE] = {
> > .startup = notify_online,
> > .teardown = NULL,
> > @@ -813,6 +821,10 @@ static struct cpuhp_step cpuhp_ap_states
> > .startup = NULL,
> > .teardown = notify_dying,
> > },
> > + [CPUHP_AP_RCUTREE_DYING] = {
> > + .startup = NULL,
> > + .teardown = rcutree_dying_cpu,
> > + },
> > [CPUHP_AP_SCHED_NOHZ_DYING] = {
> > .startup = NULL,
> > .teardown = nohz_balance_exit_idle,
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/rcutree.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/rcutree.c
> > @@ -2787,67 +2787,59 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu
> > mutex_unlock(&rsp->onoff_mutex);
> > }
> >
> > -static void __cpuinit rcu_prepare_cpu(int cpu)
> > +int __cpuinit rcutree_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
> > struct rcu_state *rsp;
> >
> > for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, rsp,
> > strcmp(rsp->name, "rcu_preempt") == 0);
> > + rcu_prepare_kthreads(cpu);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Handle CPU online/offline notification events.
> > - */
> > -static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> > - unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> > +int __cpuinit rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
> > - long cpu = (long)hcpu;
> > - struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state->rda, cpu);
> > - struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
> > struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > - int ret = NOTIFY_OK;
> >
> > - trace_rcu_utilization("Start CPU hotplug");
> > - switch (action) {
> > - case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> > - case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
> > - rcu_prepare_cpu(cpu);
> > - rcu_prepare_kthreads(cpu);
> > - break;
> > - case CPU_ONLINE:
> > - case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> > - rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1);
> > - break;
> > - case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
> > - if (nocb_cpu_expendable(cpu))
> > - rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, cpu);
> > - else
> > - ret = NOTIFY_BAD;
> > - break;
> > - case CPU_DYING:
> > - case CPU_DYING_FROZEN:
> > - /*
> > - * The whole machine is "stopped" except this CPU, so we can
> > - * touch any data without introducing corruption. We send the
> > - * dying CPU's callbacks to an arbitrarily chosen online CPU.
> > - */
> > - for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > - rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(rsp);
> > - rcu_cleanup_after_idle(cpu);
> > - break;
> > - case CPU_DEAD:
> > - case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
> > - case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
> > - case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
> > - for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > - rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(cpu, rsp);
> > - break;
> > - default:
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - trace_rcu_utilization("End CPU hotplug");
> > - return ret;
> > + for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > + rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(cpu, rsp);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __cpuinit rcutree_affinity_setting(unsigned int cpu, int outgoing)
> > +{
> > + struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state->rda, cpu);
> > +
> > + rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rdp->mynode, outgoing);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int __cpuinit rcutree_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, -1);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int __cpuinit rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + if (!nocb_cpu_expendable(cpu))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, cpu);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int __cpuinit rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > + /*
> > + * The whole machine is "stopped" except this CPU, so we can
> > + * touch any data without introducing corruption. We send the
> > + * dying CPU's callbacks to an arbitrarily chosen online CPU.
> > + */
> > + for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > + rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(rsp);
> > + rcu_cleanup_after_idle(cpu);
> > + return 0;
> > }
>
> And rcu_dying_cpu() above, along with both definitions of
> rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu().
>
> > /*
> > @@ -3071,9 +3063,8 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
> > * this is called early in boot, before either interrupts
> > * or the scheduler are operational.
> > */
> > - cpu_notifier(rcu_cpu_notify, 0);
> > for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> > - rcu_cpu_notify(NULL, CPU_UP_PREPARE, (void *)(long)cpu);
> > + rcutree_prepare_cpu(cpu);
> > check_cpu_stall_init();
> > }
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists