[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130212173505.GA2155@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:35:06 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi
tree related)
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > ---
> > arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h
> > index 34baa35..622cfa5 100644
> > --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> > #endif
> >
> > #define nop() __asm__ __volatile__ ("nop")
> > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > extern void (*sparc_idle)(void);
> > +#endif
> >
> > #endif
> >
>
> Thank you Stephen!
>
> The last time I compiled a sparc kernel was in 1993:-)
>
> I've added your fix and Dave's Ack to this patch,
> and updated it in my next branch.
Hi Len.
Can you please move the definition of sparc_idle to processor_32.h
It is sparc32 specific - and then we do not need the __ASSEMBLY__ guards
as the sparc32 variant are not used from assembler.
Do you btw. have any hints how I can convert to the cpu_idle thing you hinted?
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists