linux-kernel - Re: Should SPARC use cpuidle?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <511A83D8.7020202@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:03:04 -0500
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Should SPARC use cpuidle?


>> Can you please move the definition of sparc_idle to processor_32.h
>> It is sparc32 specific - and then we do not need the __ASSEMBLY__ guards
>> as the sparc32 variant are not used from assembler.
> 
> sure, let me know if attached works.

ugh, not accustomed to sending patches via thunderbird.
hopefully this attachment works...


View attachment "0001-sparc-idle-rename-pm_idle-to-sparc_idle.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (4056 bytes)