[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130212203420.788340558@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:34:38 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 18/61] ipv6: fix the noflags test in addrconf_get_prefix_route
3.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
[ Upstream commit 85da53bf1c336bb07ac038fb951403ab0478d2c5 ]
The tests on the flags in addrconf_get_prefix_route() does no make
much sense: the 'noflags' parameter contains the set of flags that
must not match with the route flags, so the test must be done
against 'noflags', and not against 'flags'.
Signed-off-by: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *addrconf_get_pre
continue;
if ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != flags)
continue;
- if ((noflags != 0) && ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != 0))
+ if ((rt->rt6i_flags & noflags) != 0)
continue;
dst_hold(&rt->dst);
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists