lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1302122309470.14434@axis700.grange>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:10:32 +0100 (CET)
From:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Kevin Liu <keyuan.liu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 RESEND] mmc: sdhci: check voltage range only on
 regulators aware of voltage value

Hi Marek

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

> Some regulators don't report any voltage values, so checking supported
> voltage range results in disabling all SDHCI_CAN_VDD_* flags and
> registration failure. This patch finally provides a correct fix for the
> registration of SDHCI driver with all possible voltage regulators:
> dummy, fixed and regulated without using regulator_count_voltages()
> hacks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index ba586ae..735526b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2976,7 +2976,11 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  	}
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
> -	if (host->vmmc) {
> +	/*
> +	 * Voltage range check makes sense only if regulator reports
> +	 * any voltage value.
> +	 */
> +	if (host->vmmc && regulator_get_voltage(host->vmmc) > 0) {
>  		ret = regulator_is_supported_voltage(host->vmmc, 2700000,
>  			3600000);

Wouldn't using mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask() be a better option?

Thanks
Guennadi

>  		if ((ret <= 0) || (!(caps[0] & SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330)))
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ