linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] selftests: Add tests for efivarfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1360740725.24917.25.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:32:05 +0000
From:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] selftests: Add tests for efivarfs

On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 15:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:08:49 +0000
> Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 18:05 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > > However, the tests expose a bug at the moment, so run_tests will fail. 
> > > Matt will have that fixed soon though :)
> > 
> > In which case, would it make more sense for me to take these tests
> > through the efi tree? I'm fine either way, I'm just looking for the
> > least surprising option.
> 
> I don't think it matters much at this stage.  selftests is new and is
> used by approximately zero people so if the tests fail, few will
> notice.  Let's just get it in there and get it settled down.

Fine by me. Thanks Andrew.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/