linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] nbd: support FLUSH requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <FF1216D8-C4B3-405E-A4F6-82196A796A94@alex.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:03:06 +0000
From:	Alex Bligh <alex@...x.org.uk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Alex Bligh <alex@...x.org.uk>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nbd-general@...ts.sf.net,
	Paul Clements <Paul.Clements@...eleye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nbd: support FLUSH requests


On 12 Feb 2013, at 21:32, Andrew Morton wrote:

> 
> Obviously the changelog was inadequate.  Please send along a new one
> which fully describes the reasons for this change.

To be clear I have no complaints about the rest of the patch being
merged. Supporting FLUSH but not FUA is far better than supporting
neither. I just didn't understand dropping FUA given the semantics
of nbd is in essence 'linux bios over tcp'.

-- 
Alex Bligh




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/