[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130213100851.7620A3E23F1@localhost>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:08:51 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Fix locking when calling of_get_next_available_child()
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:26:46 -0700, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> On 02/11/2013 03:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > of_get_next_available_child() obtains the devtree_lock and then calls
> > of_device_is_available() which also attempts to claim the lock. This is
> > obviously incorrect and causes a deadlock on boot. Fix issue by adding
> > an variant of of_device_is_available() which doesn't obtain the lock.
>
> This patch forgets to update __of_device_is_available() to call
> __of_get_property() rather than of_get_property() and hence doesn't
> actually solve the problem.
>
> You might want to make __of_device_is_available() static too.
Okay, I've dropped this patch and replaced it with your version since
you're actually doing better testing that I it would appear. I had to
respin my tree anyway because I messed up a merge of Rob's branch. :-(
Sorry for the noise.
New version of the tree is pushed out.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists