lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:20:36 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regmap: irq: do not write mask register if it is not
 supported

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:44:50PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Ignore the mask register write if mask_base is not provided by
> regmap irq client. This is useful when regmap irq framework is
> used for the MFD's gpio interrupt support. Typically, gpio has
> two registers related to interrupt, one is for setting interrupt

Again you're talking about specific devices as though these are generic
things related to the class of device.

>  	for (i = 0; i < d->chip->num_regs; i++) {
> +		if (!d->chip->mask_base)
> +			goto skip_mask_reg_update;
> +

Why is this inside the loop?

I'd also expect us to return an error if a caller tries to enable or
disable an interrupt, or possibly to give different ops to the IRQ
subsystem, rather than just silently claim we did what we were asked.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ