[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130213144932.GA14260@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:49:32 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anton@...ba.org, hpa@...or.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rwsem: Implement writer lock-stealing
* Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:
> On 02/09/2013 10:45 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > This proposal implements writer lock stealing in lib/rwsem.c, just as
> > Alex Shi's earlier proposal did for the simpler lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
>
> Ops, my patch in tip/urgent is for rwsem. Yuanhan's patch is
> for rwsem-spinlock.
Your rwsem patch is queued up for v3.9, in the tip:core/locking
tree:
3a15e0e0cdda rwsem: Implement writer lock-stealing for better scalability
Michel, mind having a look at that and possibly generate a delta
patch, if your patch has changes we should apply?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists