| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALLzPKY-QJmxSUDdRF9V+pjEZhVb_UcGnJsqxiUiJ=YKTr0YWg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:29:43 +0200 From: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com> To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ima: Support appraise_type=imasig_optional On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Kasatkin, Dmitry <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:36:45PM +0200, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote: >>> It should not be the only line in the policy. >>> Can you share full policy? >> >> I verified by putting some printk. There is only single rule in >> ima_policy_rules list after I have updated the rules through "policy" >> file. >> >> echo "appraise fowner=0 func=BPRM_CHECK appraise_type=imasig_optional" > >> /sys/kernel/security/policy > > There is a default policy which has several rules. > > And when you do your "echo" you will replace all rules with that single rule. > But ok, you have one rule only and it is fine to have even a single rule... > What I have not said yet it is that in your case, because you use only BPRM_CHECK hook, you do not need "dont_appraise" and "dont_measure" rules for pseudo filesystems. >> >> Thanks >> Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists