linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH RT] acpi/rt: Convert acpi lock back to a raw_spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:05:30 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...il.com>,
	Clark Williams <clark@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT] acpi/rt: Convert acpi lock back to a
 raw_spinlock_t

On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 12:51 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 18:21 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, John Kacur wrote:
> > > 
> > > Thanks Steven. That looks way better than the previous revert.
> > 
> > I can't tell as I haven't seen the previous revert. And looks good is
> > not really a good review criteria.
> 
> I agreed, and warned John on IRC about that. This is why the patch had
> RFC in the subject.
> 

I should specify that I warned John before he emailed. He wasn't giving
his ack to the patch, as he already knew it was a test patch only. It
just looked as if he did, and my reply didn't help the perspective.

;-)

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/