[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360778730.23152.11.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:05:30 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...il.com>,
Clark Williams <clark@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT] acpi/rt: Convert acpi lock back to a
raw_spinlock_t
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 12:51 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 18:21 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, John Kacur wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Steven. That looks way better than the previous revert.
> >
> > I can't tell as I haven't seen the previous revert. And looks good is
> > not really a good review criteria.
>
> I agreed, and warned John on IRC about that. This is why the patch had
> RFC in the subject.
>
I should specify that I warned John before he emailed. He wasn't giving
his ack to the patch, as he already knew it was a test patch only. It
just looked as if he did, and my reply didn't help the perspective.
;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists