[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130213183844.GB3127@joi.lan>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:38:44 +0100
From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ra.org>
Subject: Re: [ 61/61] drm/nouveau: add lockdep annotations
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:46:20PM +0100, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:43:41PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:33 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > > On 02/13/2013 04:35 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 12:35 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >> 3.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > >
> > > > FWIW, I never saw this on 3.7 but it happened 1st time on 3.8-rcX
> > > > I haven't tested this fix either.
> > >
> > > Dito.
> > >
> > > Gr. AvS
> > Yeah, I don't believe anything could trigger it in 3.7. It doesn't hurt
> > anyway.
>
> Client locking splat is definitely triggerable on 3.7:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/251
>
> Subdev locking splat is triggerable since 3.7 has "drm/nouveau: add locking
s/is/should be/
> around instobj list operations" and "drm/nvc0/fb: fix crash when different
> mutex is used to protect same list" (both applied for 3.7.3).
>
> Marcin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists