[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130213231332.GG7867@spo001.leaseweb.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:13:32 +0100
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
plagnioj@...osoft.com, fabio.porcedda@...il.com, JM.Lin@...el.com,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] watchdog/at91sam9_wdt: Remove the __initdata of at91wdt_wdd
Hi Wenyou,
> For this variable will be used in the timer handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
> Cc: wim@...ana.be
> Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c
> index e60a718..3fc90ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static struct watchdog_ops at91wdt_ops = {
> .ping = at91wdt_ping,
> };
>
> -static struct watchdog_device at91wdt_wdd __initdata = {
> +static struct watchdog_device at91wdt_wdd = {
> .timeout = WDT_HEARTBEAT,
> .min_timeout = MIN_HEARTBEAT,
> .max_timeout = MAX_HEARTBEAT,
should imho also have been part of your previous patches.
Anyway, it's also like this in the patch I just sent you.
Kind regards,
Wim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists