| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:32:35 +0100 From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> To: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix env->src_cpu for active migration On 13 February 2013 21:02, Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...il.com> wrote: >> Bingo, that was the problem in my setup: as the patch was applied >> through a script with others, I had missed the error message about the >> conflict (I have also another conflict which can be safely ignored so >> the new one did not catch my eye)... So the patch was only >> half-applied, and the final code is broken. > >> How did you solve the conflict (I am not a scheduler expert)? I can >> retry running the patched kernel with your resolution, to check if >> everything is ok. > > After looking a bit more, the conflict resolution seemed straighforward, Yes the resolution is straightforward and your patch is ok. > so I gave it a go. The attached version booted fine, so the initial > problem was purely PEBCAK... Sorry for the noise! Now, i know that my patch on frederic's branch, boots on a x86_64, Core i7 920 :-) Vincent > > -- > Damien -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists