linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][CFT] what's in signal.git queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130214112306.30ab728c@mschwide>
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:23:06 +0100
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
	Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
	Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] what's in signal.git queue

On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:25:39 +0000
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> At that point the common stem ends; as far as I'm concerned, this part is
> in never-rebase mode by now.  Then comes a bunch of per-architecture branches;
> all subject to ACK by maintainers (ones who are not MIA, that is ;-/).  Once
> maintainer(s) are OK with a branch, it's in no-rebase mode as well.  Branch
> names are of form arch-<arch name>, same as the last time around.

Just tested the signal.git master branch (didn't see any additional commit on
the arch-s390 branch). Works for me and the test suite of gdb does not come up
with any new unexpected failures. So for the s390 parts:

Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/